Remove unused 3rd argument in assert.strictEqual() #22113
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nodejs-github-bot
added
node-api
addaleax
approved these changes
Aug 3, 2018
jasnell
approved these changes
Aug 3, 2018
Trott
requested changes
Aug 3, 2018
yahavf6
force-pushed
the
yahavf6-removeUnusedSSrtingError040818
branch
from
c71cacc
to
c188ca0
Compare
|
PR updated |
cjihrig
approved these changes
Aug 4, 2018
|
Hey all, I've updated my PR
בתאריך שבת, 4 באוג׳ 2018 ב-20:31 מאת Colin Ihrig <
notifications@github.com>:
… ***@***.**** approved this pull request.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#22113 (review)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AgaT7R2XRmesq3Op0ydmB8IWAdEfUKi6ks5uNdqJgaJpZM4Vuo9T>
.
|
lpinca
approved these changes
Aug 4, 2018
maclover7
approved these changes
Aug 4, 2018
Trott
approved these changes
Aug 4, 2018
starkwang
approved these changes
Aug 5, 2018
benjamingr
approved these changes
Aug 5, 2018
|
Let's merge? |
maclover7
added
the
author ready
Trott
pushed a commit
to Trott/io.js
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 7, 2018
PR-URL: nodejs#22113 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me> Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <starkwang@126.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
|
Landed in 1284fa2. Thanks for the contribution! 🎉 (If you're interested in other possible contributions to Node.js but don't have a good idea of where to start looking, some ideas are posted at https://www.nodetodo.org/next-steps/.) |
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2018
PR-URL: #22113 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me> Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <starkwang@126.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
This was referenced Aug 16, 2018
This was referenced Aug 16, 2018
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Line 9 contains a call to assert.strictEqual(). It has a string literal as the third argument. Unfortunately, that means that if there is an AssertionError, the value of status (the first argument) will not be reported. The third argument here is not adding any value (and in fact is reporting the wrong thing in the event of an AssertionError) so removed it.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes